Why is blue laser beam shaping challenging? How to innovate and make breakthroughs?

Semiconductor Review | Friday, October 27, 2023

Joanna Qiao

Single (A)cylindrical Lenses Product Line Director of Laser Optics Business Unit, Focuslight

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

Leon Li

Vice President of Automotive BU, Vice President of Business and Strategy of Laser Optics Business Unit, Focuslight

In recent years, the utilization of blue diode lasers has undergone a remarkable expansion. Compared with near-infrared lasers (750~1100 nm), a blue laser with a wavelength in the 400~500 nm has a much higher (5x – 10x) absorption of highly reflective metals such as copper. The blue laser has become the ideal light source for high-reflective metal processing, offering substantial advantages in various industrial applications such as cutting and welding. Furthermore, in the context of the global drive for energy saving and environmental protection, blue lasers have found a prominent role in numerous emerging energy sectors. For instance, they are now integral in the production and manufacturing of electric vehicles, lithium batteries, photovoltaic systems, and wind energy equipment, where high-reflective metals such as copper are widely employed. These new applications have opened up a broad market for blue laser technology.

As the power of blue lasers gradually increases and the cost decreases, along with the emergence of more application scenarios, the market demand for blue lasers is unprecedentedly high. In novel applications such as blue laser engraving, medical care, display, and lighting, blue laser is drawing considerable attention from the market.

In the field of engraving and cutting, blue laser engraving devices can engrave patterns on metal, food, wood, plastic, and other materials, offering cost-effective solutions that cater to both commercial and household applications. In medical applications, blue laser surgical equipment can be used for prostate hyperplasia treatment, and its lower-power version can be used for the treatment of ear, nose, throat and digestive tract diseases. Blue laser 3D printing can be used for the production of human prostheses. The blue laser also has significant advantages in laser display applications like wide color space and long life, environmental protection, energy saving, etc., achieving the ultimate display effect, color, and clarity. In laser lighting applications, the laser lighting sources use blue laser to excite phosphors to produce white light, which can achieve higher power density and farther illumination distance and can be used in laser headlights, remote search, and many other fields.

1. Challenges in Beam Shaping of Blue Diode Lasers

Similar to near-infrared diode lasers, blue diode lasers also need to be matched with a suitable beam shaping solution in order to efficiently utilize the photon energy they emit. As an emerging field, blue laser beam shaping faces new challenges in beam shaping compared with infrared laser beam shaping:

🔹The absorption rate of commonly used optical materials in the blue spectrum is higher than that in the near-infrared spectrum. Excessive absorption of laser light by materials will increase the temperature rise of optical components, causing changes in the size of optical components, thereby affecting the product performance. At the same time, the temperature rise of optical components may influence the performance and reliability of the glue that fixes the optical components, thereby affecting the optical performance and reliability of the blue laser system;

🔹Blue optics’ design needs to take into account the diverse application scenarios and packaging forms of blue lasers;

🔹There are new challenges in the coating of blue light optical components.

Depending on the applications, different beam shaping methods need to be used to meet the application's demand for photon energy.

2. Beam Shaping Solution for Blue Diode Laser

To formulate suitable beam shaping solutions for blue lasers, three aspects need to be considered: selection of optical materials, micro-optical design, and optical coating design.

a. Selection of optical materials

When selecting optical component materials for blue diode laser applications, in addition to considering parameters such as hardness and refractive index, special consideration needs to be given to the challenges posed by transmittance in the blue spectrum. Common microlens glass materials (such as S-TIH53, etc.) have good transmittance (>99.5%) for the near-infrared spectrum but have low transmittance for the blue spectrum (75%~95% for S-TIH53) and higher absorption. Excessive absorptivity can cause temperature rise and thermal lens effect, resulting in changes in the size of the microlens product, thereby affecting the optical performance of the product; the temperature rise of the micro-optical lens may also affect the performance of the glue and reduce the reliability of the system.

Fused silica is an ideal raw material for blue optics components. Its high transmittance (>99.5%) in the blue spectrum makes it naturally suitable for high-power blue laser applications. However, the conversion temperature of fused silica can reach 1600 degrees, which is not suitable for thermal molding or other optical processing techniques that are commonly used for aspherical lenses. Focuslight's innovative wafer-level simultaneous structuring process offers solutions to this challenge. This technique eliminates the need for heating and melting fused silica during processing. Over time, it has evolved into a mature method extensively applied in the mass production of fused silica micro-optical components. Its adoption has been widespread in recent years across various fields, including the beam shaping of infrared semiconductor lasers and UV homogenizers for photolithography machines.

On the other hand, the refractive index of fused silica is about 1.46, lower than common optical materials with a refractive index of 1.8 such as S-TIH53. This variance imposes constraints on optical design. Although optical designs such as biconvex lenses can be considered for refractive index compensation, this will significantly increase the cost and is not an ideal choice for situations where high refractive index is required. Focuslight’s wafer-level simultaneous structuring process can be used to process almost any non-toxic optical glass, including materials such as calcium fluoride, magnesium fluoride, and even silicon and germanium suitable for infrared and deep ultraviolet applications. Therefore, after two years of dedicated R&D and exploration, Focuslight has successfully developed and introduced a new material (designated as FL-Blue) that is adapted to the wafer-level simultaneous structuring process, demonstrating low absorption in the blue spectrum (transmittance >99%) and a high refractive index (n >1.7). Based on this material, Focuslight has released Blue FAC 250, Blue FAC 300, Blue FAC 380, and Blue FAC 600 series fast axis collimator (FAC) products. Additionally, small batches of blue optical components have been delivered to leading blue laser customers worldwide.

b. Micro-optical design

With the right optical materials in place, it's equally important to employ fitting optical designs that can accommodate the diverse application scenarios of blue lasers.

Blue diode lasers usually come in different forms such as CoS packaged single emitters, TO-can packaged single emitters, and chip arrays (bars). For different light source forms and different application scenarios, targeted designs are required to meet application needs.

At Focuslight, various micro-optical surface structures, such as aspherical cylinders, parabolas, free-form surfaces, and other surface structures can be realized using wafer-level simultaneous structuring process. Through high-precision processing of double-sided micro-optics, the integration of multiple lenses can also be achieved on micro-sized optical products.

When doing optical design, it is also necessary to consider the refraction and diffraction effects of light at the same time. Focuslight uses ray tracing algorithms and wave optics theory to conduct optical simulations, and also uses self-developed wave optics simulation software to fully simulate the diffraction effect.

Focuslight has designed and released multiple high-performance blue laser optical component products based on different materials such as FL Blue and fused silica, such as blue fast axis collimators (FACs), blue meniscus slow axis collimators (SACs), monolithic collimators, monolithic fiber couplers, fused silica lens arrays, and fused silica beam transformation systems (BTS).

c. Optical coating design

Once materials are selected and optical designs finalized, blue laser optical components undergo crucial optical coating. With over 20 years of expertise, Focuslight's team employs advanced film design and characterization techniques for complex and challenging settings, ensuring cost-effective large-scale coating production. Its coating solutions cover various types such as anti-reflection coating, high-reflection coating, ultra-low-reflection coating, filtering, and beam splitting. Customized coatings can be developed for customers based on the application requirements of different products. Focuslight also conducts tests of laser damage threshold, weak absorption, temperature rise, and environmental reliability to ensure stable, consistent performance during long-term use and mass production.

Focuslight provides a range of high-performance, high-reliability optical components for blue beam shaping. With 30 years of beam shaping excellence in micro-optical design and manufacturing, Focuslight offers precise control over photon manipulation, achieving optimal results for various applications. This expertise allows for precise photon control, ensuring ideal outcomes across diverse applications. Focuslight’s world’s leading wafer-level simultaneous structuring technology produces polished wafers up to 300 x 300 mm², offering a scalable and cost-effective solution for high-volume production, with a monthly capacity over 3 million pieces.

More in News

PCB design software is now becoming increasingly inseparable from workforce issues for electronics companies. This challenge goes beyond having access to a good platform for engineers; many organizations find themselves facing problems when trying to adopt software due to their inability to recruit experienced PCB experts or provide proper training programs. This challenge tends to appear most strongly in companies scaling up electronics capabilities with limited hardware design teams in place. PCB designs continue requiring highly specialized skills, particularly when it comes to routing, signal integrity and manufacturing processes that might not be immediately obvious at earlier stages of the process. The increased complexity of software plays a big role here as well. Some PCB design environments incorporate extensive feature sets that have been gradually built up over years in the industry, meaning that veteran engineers can easily feel at home in them while relatively new professionals find difficulty adjusting to the workflow of such systems. This challenge creates an interesting disconnect between software features and engineering teams' ability to adopt the platform effectively. Managers who invest money in state-of-the-art software often find out that the time required for onboarding is longer than anticipated or that a few senior PCB designers end up being involved in almost all key layout-related decisions. These issues have a significant impact on how electronics organizations are preparing for product development in terms of staff planning. Companies are competing more than ever to recruit engineers who are comfortable with moving from schematic designs to layout reviews and further to manufacturing without undergoing extensive training programs. PCB software skills are now becoming an important topic in recruitment interviews rather than just preferences of engineers. Training issues themselves create further challenges for electronics organizations in their efforts to scale up their capabilities. Mentorship has always been a major aspect of developing PCB skills, yet shorter deadlines make it more difficult to engage experienced workers in the process of onboarding new recruits who can take over their jobs in a year or two. Collaboration through remote channels has also made a difference, since it enables electronics companies to become more flexible when recruiting talent, but reduces interactions through which newer employees could gain insight into layout-related processes or manufacturing issues that emerge during project implementation. Some electronics organizations respond to such challenges by limiting the complexity of some parts of the workflow or restricting software usage to essential features available for broad implementation across teams. Others continue prioritizing highly specialized design environments despite their longer onboarding process needs. Software vendors might find themselves under greater pressure related to user interface, features and training as a consequence of current workforce-related concerns among buyers. Those companies will start focusing more on how long it takes to turn new recruits into productive members of the design team independent of experienced engineers. It seems that these workforce challenges cannot go away anytime soon. The PCB designing process remains highly technical and tightly connected with manufacturing requirements, meaning that electronics organizations have to be careful not to simplify everything too much. Still, the discourse surrounding PCB software adoption is beginning to extend into a discussion of workforce issues. ...Read more
PCB software purchasing processes have become more focused on preparation for manufacturing, at least among businesses working in a tight development schedule and producing fewer prototypes per cycle. Its an indication of growing concern regarding a practical situation within the industry. Completion of a design no longer means it will be manufactured efficiently. Engineering teams spend more time checking whether design outputs and documentation provide a clean transfer without requiring further clarification from manufacturers. It has been an ongoing problem. The recent state of production, however, seems to draw attention to the consequences. Component swapping, procurement complications, and fabrication schedule changes can reveal gaps in the documentation process that would otherwise go unnoticed under normal production conditions. Purchasing conversations related to PCB software have begun addressing the issue. Design tools that allow to update the bill of materials, provide consistent fabrication outputs, and communicate design rules effectively across teams are being prioritized. Software is judged based on the amount of ambiguity it leaves after design and before production. It creates even greater pressure for small-volume PCB manufacturing. Independent electronics developers and specialized device designers frequently work with external fabrication vendors that produce devices for multiple clients at once. In such a setting, poor documentation can lead to a rapid drop in priority. The issue is further complicated by emerging problems with component procurement. Routing and board redesign due to sourcing requirements may impact the size, thermal properties, and other factors that need to be considered throughout the rest of the development process. Software environments lacking proper revision tracking may introduce complications with understanding which designs and outputs need to be applied. Such discussions have expanded beyond individual engineers' concerns to cover overall team experience. A successful completion of the layout work does not automatically guarantee smooth production. Many cases have seen manufacturing teams identify preventable errors during their reviews. In certain settings, such incidents can be attributed to software workflow problems. There are also financial ramifications. A delay in the prototype creation may interfere with testing schedules and customer demonstrations. In such a case, a design system capable of minimizing production-related clarifications may be considered more valuable than one providing additional features that engineers never use. The competitive environment in the industry is likely to change as a result. Feature enhancement is traditionally the cornerstone of vendor strategy when selling a PCB solution. Some potential customers, however, place greater value on consistent preparation for manufacturing than in increasingly complex design tools. It does not necessarily mean the advanced features lose importance. There remains a high demand for comprehensive simulation and layout management for complex electronics. Still, many users care about their consistency rather than capabilities. Overall, there is an emerging shift in value assessment criteria. Instead of evaluating performance in the engineering department, the discussion begins addressing productivity issues during production, communication with the supplier, and revision tracking. ...Read more
Shrinking timelines for hardware engineering have arrived in areas where many teams developing printed circuit boards do not feel prepared. Revisions of the product that took longer times to make and move to manufacturing review are expected to be completed far faster, particularly in industries with electronics associated with connected devices, industrial equipment or compact consumer devices. These conditions are changing expectations of PCB design solutions. Customers are looking carefully at the speed of moving design modifications across stages of layout reviews, simulations and fabrication preparation without producing new verification bottlenecks further down the road. This does not relate to the need to incorporate additional capabilities into design platforms; the goal here is the reduction of bottlenecks between stages already stuffed with dependencies. Increasingly dense circuitry designs, higher density of component placement and greater interplay between electrical and mechanical engineering teams cause delays when it comes to handling revisions. Engineering teams used to thinking of PCB design platforms as tools for drafting the layout now pay more attention to the software as a layer of coordination between decisions about the layout and the schedule for production. This affects software purchasing conversations in practical terms. Workflows for importing designs, managing revisions and matching manufacturing needs now play a more significant role, as redesign iterations are becoming costly. Small hardware companies seem particularly susceptible to this trend. Big corporations can cover additional verification rounds with engineering capacity, while smaller operations are forced to rely on a few experts who will perform layout validation, comply with requirements and arrange fabrication in parallel. Any delay in handing off the design will cause the postponement of procurement or prototyping by days or even weeks. PCB solution vendors find themselves dealing with more divided audiences as well. While some customers seek simulation capabilities, others will look for consistent output or a strong library management system. These differences have produced a fragmentation in the industry because each engineering challenge has its own definition of what a streamlined process looks like. A new problem has appeared regarding onboarding. Experienced engineers are still hard to replace, although some software requires high levels of familiarity with the workflow. Training time has become a factor in evaluating solutions for PCB design, particularly for electronics engineering teams that include embedded software developers or people responsible for production. Distributed engineering also complicates matters. Reviews of the printed circuit board layout could involve employees operating from different locations or independent contractors working on a limited basis. Software platforms that confuse the user on versioning or the owner of a particular design can introduce issues in fabrication reviews, which are detected much later down the line. None of this means that there is an impending revolution coming to the PCB design solutions segment. Many teams prefer well-established design platforms and are reluctant to change their existing workflow. The work with the layout is too close to fabrication for electronics engineering teams to replace existing solutions easily. Nevertheless, conversations about PCB design software are starting to go beyond the questions of interfaces or feature sets. Engineering deadlines vary considerably across electronic markets, which prompts discussions of whether there might be too much room for delays in design processes. ...Read more
Ultrashort laser pulse solutions are redefining possibilities across high-precision industries and scientific fields. Known for their exceptional control and minimal heat impact, these lasers enable clean, accurate processing of delicate materials and biological tissues. Their applications span from advanced micromachining to groundbreaking medical procedures and ultrafast scientific experiments. By offering unmatched precision and versatility, ultrashort laser pulses are becoming essential tools in driving innovation, efficiency, and discovery in modern technology and research. Precision in Micromachining and Material Processing Ultrashort laser pulse solutions are transforming the field of micromachining and advanced material processing. These lasers emit pulses measured in femtoseconds or picoseconds, allowing them to interact with materials in an extremely controlled and localized manner. Because the energy is delivered in such short bursts, there is minimal heat transfer to the surrounding area. This results in high-precision cutting, drilling, or structuring without causing thermal damage or creating unwanted deformations on sensitive substrates. This level of precision is particularly beneficial for industries working with delicate or composite materials, including medical devices, semiconductors, and aerospace components. Renesas Electronics Corporation supports advanced semiconductor development through integrated hardware, software, and system design capabilities. For instance, in electronic manufacturing, ultrashort laser pulses can create micro-holes and intricate patterns in thin films and multilayered boards without impacting adjacent structures. This capability supports ongoing miniaturization efforts while preserving the integrity and performance of critical components. These laser solutions are ideal for processing transparent or brittle materials like glass, sapphire, and ceramics. Traditional methods often struggle with these materials due to cracking or chipping, but ultrashort pulses can process them cleanly and efficiently. The non-thermal interaction mechanism allows for superior surface quality and edge sharpness, making this technology a key enabler of next-generation precision manufacturing. Miller Sales Engineering supports precision manufacturing through engineered solutions that enhance component performance, reliability, and process efficiency. Advances in Medical and Scientific Applications Ultrashort laser pulse technology is also making significant contributions in medical procedures and scientific research. In the biomedical field, these lasers are used in procedures requiring extreme accuracy, such as eye surgeries and microscale tissue ablation. The ultrashort pulse duration promotes faster healing, minimizes collateral damage to surrounding tissues, and reduces the risk of complications. Surgeons and researchers benefit from the high level of control, which is essential when working in sensitive biological environments. In scientific research, ultrashort laser pulses are enabling breakthroughs in imaging, spectroscopy, and diagnostics. They are used to generate high-resolution images at the cellular or even molecular level, helping scientists understand biological processes in unprecedented detail. Their ability to produce high peak intensities also makes them useful for nonlinear optical experiments, where multiple photons are absorbed simultaneously to reveal information that is not accessible through conventional light sources. These laser systems are used in time-resolved studies to observe ultrafast phenomena, such as electron movement and chemical reactions. Researchers can use this data to develop more efficient materials, study complex biological systems, or enhance drug development. By delivering extremely short, high-intensity light pulses, ultrashort laser technology opens new frontiers in precision and discovery across disciplines. ...Read more