Mini and Micro LED Processing Technology

Semiconductor Review | Wednesday, August 16, 2023

The long-term development logic of the LED industry aligns with "Haitz's Law", which is the continuous improvement of luminous efficiency and cost reduction. These two factors together drive the penetration of LED applications and technological advancements, analogous to the semiconductor Moore's Law - the LED industry experiences a 20-fold increase in production output every decade, while costs have decreased to one-tenth of their original value. Over the past 30 years, high power, miniaturization, and full-color capabilities have emerged as key drivers for LED applications in the fields of displays, backlighting, and lighting.

Mini LED and Micro LED (also known as μLED) refer to LEDs with chip sizes smaller than 200μm and 50μm, respectively. Same as conventional LEDs, they are self-emissive and typically used in direct display applications of varying sizes, where each pixel can be individually controlled using RGB LED chips that emit three different colors of light. From a technical and display standpoint, Mini and Micro LEDs inherit the characteristics of LEDs. With energy consumption of only 10% of LCD and 50% of OLED, they offer 30 times the brightness of OLED and a resolution of up to 1500 PPI. In addition to these advantages, they also exhibit high reliability, fast response times, long lifespans, and quick refresh rates.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

Over the next decade, as LED chips continue to decrease in size and cost and manufacturing challenges being overcome. There is a projection that the Mini and Micro LED will bring about a revolution in backlighting and display technologies. These advancements have the potential to become the ultimate solution for various applications, including commercial displays, wearable devices, smartphones, computers, and more.

The development of new technologies will inevitably bring about continuous iteration and upgrading of process technologies. In the process of developing from Mini LED to Micro LED, as the size of a single LED chip is reduced by multiples, its display effect and precision have been improved, and the number of LED chips used in the same area has also increased by multiples. Taking the 4K resolution direct display panel as an example, it has nearly 8.3 million display pixels and about 24 million LED chips. Due to the need for such a huge amount of chips, mass transfer, mass soldering, chip repair, and drive control technology in the panel manufacturing process now require new groundbreaking processes to solve technical problems.

1. Laser Mass Transfer

In the field of Mini and Micro LED display technology, the primary challenge to address lies in the mass transfer of chips. This complex transfer typically involves multiple pivotal steps: the collective release of Micro LED chips from the donor/growth substrate, the adjustment of chip pitches, and the precise alignment and movement of chips onto the receiving substrate. The conventional mechanical transfer equipment can only transfer tens of chips per second, which falls short of meeting the demands for large-scale production of Micro LEDs. Consequently, mass transfer technology has emerged to overcome this limitation.

Commonly used chip mass transfer methods include Electrostatic Adhesion Transfer, Fluid Assembly Transfer, Elastic Impression Transfer, Laser Mass Transfer, etc.

Through continuous technological development and iteration, mass transfer is considered a highly beneficial and efficient solution. Its principle involves the interaction between materials and laser beams generated by laser devices, wherein the LED substrate material absorbs photons of ultraviolet (UV) wavelength, leading to a change in its properties. As a result, a large number of LED chips can be simultaneously detached from the substrate. This transfer technique requires precise control of the laser power and energy density to ensure minimal impact on the chip performance and achieve high transfer yield and efficiency.

Focuslight offers comprehensive photon application solutions for Mini LED and Micro LED’s mass transfer, utilizing its core technologies in photon generation and photon control. Based on the laser light source in the ultraviolet (UV) band, Focuslight leverages ultraviolet (UV) wavelength laser sources to design flexible optical solutions that cater to the varying process requirements of our customers. These solutions are tailored to achieve customized laser beam -features for the mass transfer process, ensuring a comprehensive balance between laser power, energy uniformity, and beam size. This enables us to match the mass production needs and capacity requirements of customers with different product sizes.

2. Laser Mass Soldering

Mass soldering is another critical step in the main manufacturing process of Mini and Micro LED displays. The traditional soldering method uses a reflow oven to join the LED chips and electrodes together by melting and solidifying the solder. The solder solidification process goes through a solid-liquid-solid phase transition. However, due to the small size of the LED chip, displacement can arise during the crystallization process. Moreover, the prolonged heating process within the reflow oven, which necessitates heating the entire substrate, can lead to substrate deformation issues during the reflow.

As an alternative technology to the traditional method, laser mass soldering has the advantages of short heating time, controllable soldering effect, no significant displacement of the chip, selectable heating area, and no deformation of the substrate. However, laser reflow soldering with traditional "point-shape" light sources has been greatly challenged in this application. Taking a 4K Micro LED TV as an example, the number of pixels are 4096×2160 (about 8.3 million pixels) and each pixel has an RGB three-color chip, then the total number of chips is about 24 million. When it comes to point beam soldering, the productivity is incredibly low, making it difficult to achieve the desired results. Therefore, laser “mass soldering” becomes the optimal solution.

Mass soldering refers to the process of simultaneously soldering multiple LED chips within a specific area, which is in a good contrast to the traditional soldering methods that can only handle one point at a time. Implementing Focuslight's innovative photon control technology, mass soldering can transform the conventional point-shape beam into a homogeneous and extended area beam that is employed to heat simultaneously larger soldering areas of Mini and Micro LED chips. Through the process, the LED chips are heated and soldered all at once, resulting in the desired productivity of mass soldering.

3. Laser Chip Repair

To enhance the yield rate of the mass transfer and mass soldering for Mini LED and Micro LED chips, spatially defined repairing of LED pixel becomes a crucial step in the process. For instance, the mass transfer process must maintain an accuracy of within plus or minus 0.5 microns for each chip to ensure the yield, but even with a yield rate as high as 99.999%, a 4K TV will still have approximately 260 dead pixels that require repair. This is where the laser's high precision and directivity play a significant role. Typically, the laser chip repair process involves several steps such as AOI (Automated Optical Inspection) detection, laser removal, and laser soldering. Initially, high-precision detection equipment is utilized to identify and locate dead spots on the chips. Subsequently, high-peak energy laser beams are employed to remove these dead spots. Finally, the single chips undergo transfer and laser soldering repair, ultimately completing the repair process for the dead spots.

Focuslight provides comprehensive photon application solutions for Mini LED and Micro LED chip repair powered by our own core technologies of photon generation and photon control. A good example is our NIR laser systems with extremely small rectangular beam output, where the beam size can be customized according to the target applications: The minimum beam length can reach as short as 50μm, while the energy output in the length and width direction can still be top-hat with a uniformity of >97%, making it an optimal solution to the repair of LED chips in different sizes.

Focuslight was an early pioneer in recognizing the emerging growth potential of Mini & Micro LED technology. Since 2019, the company has been at the forefront of research and development in the field of mass soldering for Mini & Micro LEDs. Over the past two years, Focuslight has successfully collaborated with various customers in the laser mass transfer and laser chip repair sectors, leveraging its extensive know-how in diode lasers and beam shaping technologies. Through years of dedicated research and accumulation of expertise, Focuslight proudly introduced the Flux H series laser system. This product is designed to offer efficient photon application solutions specifically tailored to laser mass soldering and laser chip repair.

The Flux H laser system (designed for mass soldering applications), utilizes a fiber-coupled diode laser source operating at a wavelength of 976nm and delivering a power ranging from 4000 to 10000W. Powered by Focuslight’s proprietary optical design, the Flux H regulates the beam size and homogenization through micro-optic modules from both the beam length and width directions. The output beam is continuously adjustable in its width and length from 2mm to 200mm, as the uniformity maintains as high as > 97%.

The Flux H laser system (applied to laser chip repair ) uses a fiber-coupled diode laser source with a power of 30-150W and a wavelength of 976nm. The length and width of the output beam can achieve precise size control (365µmx105µm) and excellent optical homogenization with a uniformity exceeding 90 %.

Focuslight’s Flux H series laser system masters the following three key points of Mini LED and Micro LED mass soldering and laser chip repair process, and provides optimal solutions.

Beam control: Focuslight’s unique Refractive Optical Elements (ROE) shaping technology enables diode lasers to output large or precisely small beam spots in square, linear, and rectangular geometries. Customers can choose the standard beam size or customize the beam parameters according to their specific needs. This allows for one-time soldering of the entire area covered by the beam, truly achieving the goal of massive soldering and precise laser chip repair through accurately sized spots.

Uniformity: Thanks to Focuslight’s homogenization technology, the upper limit of the beam uniformity can reach 99% with no zero-order diffraction. In actual products, the beam uniformity can be as high as >97%, effectively ensuring high yields and outstanding consistency within the soldering area.

Closed-loop temperature control: The closed-loop temperature control can effectively simulate the control process of the high-temperature reflow oven. It enables the editing of temperature-time envelopes and the realization of processes such as solder paste preheating > heat up > heat preservation > cool down > cooling.

As an industry leader in high-power diode laser and its application solutions, is capable of providing tailored photonics application solutions for Mini and Micro LED display processes, covering components, modules, assemblies, and subsystems. Focuslight strives to be the globally trusted photonics solution provider through innovation, manufacturing excellence, and fast response to fully unlock the potential of photonics to enhance and enrich people's life!

About the Author:

Weiyi Gu, Vice President of Focuslight’s Pan-Semiconductor Solutions Business Unit. Graduated from the School of Telecommunications of Xi’an Technological University with a master's degree in engineering. He has more than ten years of experience in the field of laser applications and focuses on the product and application development of high-power diode laser systems in advanced manufacturing and pan-semiconductor fields. He has led the development of Focuslight’s DLight H, DLight S, and Flux H series high-power diode laser systems.

 

More in News

PCB design software is now becoming increasingly inseparable from workforce issues for electronics companies. This challenge goes beyond having access to a good platform for engineers; many organizations find themselves facing problems when trying to adopt software due to their inability to recruit experienced PCB experts or provide proper training programs. This challenge tends to appear most strongly in companies scaling up electronics capabilities with limited hardware design teams in place. PCB designs continue requiring highly specialized skills, particularly when it comes to routing, signal integrity and manufacturing processes that might not be immediately obvious at earlier stages of the process. The increased complexity of software plays a big role here as well. Some PCB design environments incorporate extensive feature sets that have been gradually built up over years in the industry, meaning that veteran engineers can easily feel at home in them while relatively new professionals find difficulty adjusting to the workflow of such systems. This challenge creates an interesting disconnect between software features and engineering teams' ability to adopt the platform effectively. Managers who invest money in state-of-the-art software often find out that the time required for onboarding is longer than anticipated or that a few senior PCB designers end up being involved in almost all key layout-related decisions. These issues have a significant impact on how electronics organizations are preparing for product development in terms of staff planning. Companies are competing more than ever to recruit engineers who are comfortable with moving from schematic designs to layout reviews and further to manufacturing without undergoing extensive training programs. PCB software skills are now becoming an important topic in recruitment interviews rather than just preferences of engineers. Training issues themselves create further challenges for electronics organizations in their efforts to scale up their capabilities. Mentorship has always been a major aspect of developing PCB skills, yet shorter deadlines make it more difficult to engage experienced workers in the process of onboarding new recruits who can take over their jobs in a year or two. Collaboration through remote channels has also made a difference, since it enables electronics companies to become more flexible when recruiting talent, but reduces interactions through which newer employees could gain insight into layout-related processes or manufacturing issues that emerge during project implementation. Some electronics organizations respond to such challenges by limiting the complexity of some parts of the workflow or restricting software usage to essential features available for broad implementation across teams. Others continue prioritizing highly specialized design environments despite their longer onboarding process needs. Software vendors might find themselves under greater pressure related to user interface, features and training as a consequence of current workforce-related concerns among buyers. Those companies will start focusing more on how long it takes to turn new recruits into productive members of the design team independent of experienced engineers. It seems that these workforce challenges cannot go away anytime soon. The PCB designing process remains highly technical and tightly connected with manufacturing requirements, meaning that electronics organizations have to be careful not to simplify everything too much. Still, the discourse surrounding PCB software adoption is beginning to extend into a discussion of workforce issues. ...Read more
PCB software purchasing processes have become more focused on preparation for manufacturing, at least among businesses working in a tight development schedule and producing fewer prototypes per cycle. Its an indication of growing concern regarding a practical situation within the industry. Completion of a design no longer means it will be manufactured efficiently. Engineering teams spend more time checking whether design outputs and documentation provide a clean transfer without requiring further clarification from manufacturers. It has been an ongoing problem. The recent state of production, however, seems to draw attention to the consequences. Component swapping, procurement complications, and fabrication schedule changes can reveal gaps in the documentation process that would otherwise go unnoticed under normal production conditions. Purchasing conversations related to PCB software have begun addressing the issue. Design tools that allow to update the bill of materials, provide consistent fabrication outputs, and communicate design rules effectively across teams are being prioritized. Software is judged based on the amount of ambiguity it leaves after design and before production. It creates even greater pressure for small-volume PCB manufacturing. Independent electronics developers and specialized device designers frequently work with external fabrication vendors that produce devices for multiple clients at once. In such a setting, poor documentation can lead to a rapid drop in priority. The issue is further complicated by emerging problems with component procurement. Routing and board redesign due to sourcing requirements may impact the size, thermal properties, and other factors that need to be considered throughout the rest of the development process. Software environments lacking proper revision tracking may introduce complications with understanding which designs and outputs need to be applied. Such discussions have expanded beyond individual engineers' concerns to cover overall team experience. A successful completion of the layout work does not automatically guarantee smooth production. Many cases have seen manufacturing teams identify preventable errors during their reviews. In certain settings, such incidents can be attributed to software workflow problems. There are also financial ramifications. A delay in the prototype creation may interfere with testing schedules and customer demonstrations. In such a case, a design system capable of minimizing production-related clarifications may be considered more valuable than one providing additional features that engineers never use. The competitive environment in the industry is likely to change as a result. Feature enhancement is traditionally the cornerstone of vendor strategy when selling a PCB solution. Some potential customers, however, place greater value on consistent preparation for manufacturing than in increasingly complex design tools. It does not necessarily mean the advanced features lose importance. There remains a high demand for comprehensive simulation and layout management for complex electronics. Still, many users care about their consistency rather than capabilities. Overall, there is an emerging shift in value assessment criteria. Instead of evaluating performance in the engineering department, the discussion begins addressing productivity issues during production, communication with the supplier, and revision tracking. ...Read more
Shrinking timelines for hardware engineering have arrived in areas where many teams developing printed circuit boards do not feel prepared. Revisions of the product that took longer times to make and move to manufacturing review are expected to be completed far faster, particularly in industries with electronics associated with connected devices, industrial equipment or compact consumer devices. These conditions are changing expectations of PCB design solutions. Customers are looking carefully at the speed of moving design modifications across stages of layout reviews, simulations and fabrication preparation without producing new verification bottlenecks further down the road. This does not relate to the need to incorporate additional capabilities into design platforms; the goal here is the reduction of bottlenecks between stages already stuffed with dependencies. Increasingly dense circuitry designs, higher density of component placement and greater interplay between electrical and mechanical engineering teams cause delays when it comes to handling revisions. Engineering teams used to thinking of PCB design platforms as tools for drafting the layout now pay more attention to the software as a layer of coordination between decisions about the layout and the schedule for production. This affects software purchasing conversations in practical terms. Workflows for importing designs, managing revisions and matching manufacturing needs now play a more significant role, as redesign iterations are becoming costly. Small hardware companies seem particularly susceptible to this trend. Big corporations can cover additional verification rounds with engineering capacity, while smaller operations are forced to rely on a few experts who will perform layout validation, comply with requirements and arrange fabrication in parallel. Any delay in handing off the design will cause the postponement of procurement or prototyping by days or even weeks. PCB solution vendors find themselves dealing with more divided audiences as well. While some customers seek simulation capabilities, others will look for consistent output or a strong library management system. These differences have produced a fragmentation in the industry because each engineering challenge has its own definition of what a streamlined process looks like. A new problem has appeared regarding onboarding. Experienced engineers are still hard to replace, although some software requires high levels of familiarity with the workflow. Training time has become a factor in evaluating solutions for PCB design, particularly for electronics engineering teams that include embedded software developers or people responsible for production. Distributed engineering also complicates matters. Reviews of the printed circuit board layout could involve employees operating from different locations or independent contractors working on a limited basis. Software platforms that confuse the user on versioning or the owner of a particular design can introduce issues in fabrication reviews, which are detected much later down the line. None of this means that there is an impending revolution coming to the PCB design solutions segment. Many teams prefer well-established design platforms and are reluctant to change their existing workflow. The work with the layout is too close to fabrication for electronics engineering teams to replace existing solutions easily. Nevertheless, conversations about PCB design software are starting to go beyond the questions of interfaces or feature sets. Engineering deadlines vary considerably across electronic markets, which prompts discussions of whether there might be too much room for delays in design processes. ...Read more
Ultrashort laser pulse solutions are redefining possibilities across high-precision industries and scientific fields. Known for their exceptional control and minimal heat impact, these lasers enable clean, accurate processing of delicate materials and biological tissues. Their applications span from advanced micromachining to groundbreaking medical procedures and ultrafast scientific experiments. By offering unmatched precision and versatility, ultrashort laser pulses are becoming essential tools in driving innovation, efficiency, and discovery in modern technology and research. Precision in Micromachining and Material Processing Ultrashort laser pulse solutions are transforming the field of micromachining and advanced material processing. These lasers emit pulses measured in femtoseconds or picoseconds, allowing them to interact with materials in an extremely controlled and localized manner. Because the energy is delivered in such short bursts, there is minimal heat transfer to the surrounding area. This results in high-precision cutting, drilling, or structuring without causing thermal damage or creating unwanted deformations on sensitive substrates. This level of precision is particularly beneficial for industries working with delicate or composite materials, including medical devices, semiconductors, and aerospace components. Renesas Electronics Corporation supports advanced semiconductor development through integrated hardware, software, and system design capabilities. For instance, in electronic manufacturing, ultrashort laser pulses can create micro-holes and intricate patterns in thin films and multilayered boards without impacting adjacent structures. This capability supports ongoing miniaturization efforts while preserving the integrity and performance of critical components. These laser solutions are ideal for processing transparent or brittle materials like glass, sapphire, and ceramics. Traditional methods often struggle with these materials due to cracking or chipping, but ultrashort pulses can process them cleanly and efficiently. The non-thermal interaction mechanism allows for superior surface quality and edge sharpness, making this technology a key enabler of next-generation precision manufacturing. Miller Sales Engineering supports precision manufacturing through engineered solutions that enhance component performance, reliability, and process efficiency. Advances in Medical and Scientific Applications Ultrashort laser pulse technology is also making significant contributions in medical procedures and scientific research. In the biomedical field, these lasers are used in procedures requiring extreme accuracy, such as eye surgeries and microscale tissue ablation. The ultrashort pulse duration promotes faster healing, minimizes collateral damage to surrounding tissues, and reduces the risk of complications. Surgeons and researchers benefit from the high level of control, which is essential when working in sensitive biological environments. In scientific research, ultrashort laser pulses are enabling breakthroughs in imaging, spectroscopy, and diagnostics. They are used to generate high-resolution images at the cellular or even molecular level, helping scientists understand biological processes in unprecedented detail. Their ability to produce high peak intensities also makes them useful for nonlinear optical experiments, where multiple photons are absorbed simultaneously to reveal information that is not accessible through conventional light sources. These laser systems are used in time-resolved studies to observe ultrafast phenomena, such as electron movement and chemical reactions. Researchers can use this data to develop more efficient materials, study complex biological systems, or enhance drug development. By delivering extremely short, high-intensity light pulses, ultrashort laser technology opens new frontiers in precision and discovery across disciplines. ...Read more