An Overview of Electronic Design Automation

Semiconductor Review | Thursday, April 20, 2023

The scale of integrated circuits based on advanced process nodes might exceed billions of semiconductor devices due to the rising complexity of chip design.

Electronic design automation (EDA) refers to a consortium of computer software tools that help with the design, production, packaging, and testing of large-scale integrated circuit chips. It's a form of CAD (Computer Aided Design) that has been generalised. EDA developed in the middle of the 1960s from the ideas of computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), computer-aided testing (CAT), and computer-aided engineering (CAE).

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

Industrial software can be categorised into three main areas from the application link: R & D design, production scheduling and process control, and business management. PLM, MES, and ERP are typical examples of industrial software systems in these three fields, while EDA and PLM are related to R&D and the design of industrial software. Integrating the most recent developments in the use of electronic technology, computer technology, information processing, and intelligent technology, EDA technology uses computers as the working platform for the automatic design of electronic products. Integrated circuit design, production, and manufacturing are complex processes.

Driving the development of chip design, manufacturing and terminal applications, EDA design tools cover the front-end circuit design, verification, back-end physical design, packaging design and testability design of the industry chain.

Before the invention of EDA tools, circuit designers drew their designs by hand. Using EDA software, electronic designers can create integrated circuit products from circuit design to performance analysis to design IC layout or PCB layout, substantially increasing work efficiency and lowering labour intensity. This optimises the chip manufacturing process and drives the downstream links of the chip industry chain.

EDA is the most upstream and high-end industry in the integrated circuit industry chain in the semiconductor industry, the cornerstone of chip design, and one of the crucial support mechanisms for chip design innovation.

Types of EDA

EDA is particularly important for semiconductor design, but it also has significant uses in PCB board design and flat panel display design. Various claims have been made regarding the classification of EDA. EDA is frequently categorised into IC design software, circuit design and simulation tools, PCB design tools, PLD design tools, and other EDA software, among other categories. The division of EDA into digital design, analogue design, wafer production, packaging, services, and the other five categories based on products is another typical classification technique.

PCB EDA

PCB design and production are both included in PCB EDA. Protel, OrCAD, Viewlogic, PowerPCB, Cadence PSD, Mentor's Expedition PCB, Zuken CadStart, Winboard, Windraft, Ivex-SPICE, PCB Studio, TANG, and many others are examples of PCB design tools. Software for PCB manufacturing primarily consists of tools for PCB fabrication and process controls.

Flat Panel Display EDA

The FDA mainly consists of flat panel display design EDA for panel manufacturers. This design process includes circuit design verification, layout design, circuit schematic design, circuit simulation, circuit layout parasitic parameter extraction, and many more, like the design process of analogue integrated circuits with their own unique design process and design method. EDA is also the linchpin of flat panel display circuit design, similar to integrated circuit design.

IC EDA

• IC Design Category

Front-end design, additionally referred to as logic design, focuses primarily on the functional design of the chip, whereas back-end design, also known as physical design, focuses primarily on design related to processes, making it a chip with manufacturing significance. Chip design is divided into several subdivisions, including RTL writing, functional verification, logic synthesis, formal verification, DFT, layout and route, Sign Off, and layout verification. Because the specific procedures for designing digital and analogue chips differ, different EDA software is also needed.

• Digital Circuit Design

Front-end logic design and back-end physical design make up the bulk of it, and front-end designers and back-end designers typically play different roles on teams. Front-end design and back-end design are typically separated by the generated gate-level netlist, despite the lack of a standard and distinct boundary.

The front-end designer starts with the chip architecture and ends with the netlist, focusing on designing and verifying circuit functions and logic with the help of front-end verification engineers, architecture engineers, DFT engineers, etc.; Layout-and-route is the starting point for the back-end designer, and the final product is a GDSII file that can be submitted to the fab for tape-out.

Digital circuit front-end design, which primarily consists of the two components of design and verification, focuses on logic functions to meet required specifications. The specific procedure entails, among other things: top-level module integration and verification, logic synthesis, formal verification, static timing analysis, testability timing insertion, and overall system planning.

The implementation and flow of processes are mostly considered in the layout and simulation phases of the back-end design of digital circuits. The specific procedure entails such steps as wiring, signal integrity analysis, parasitic parameter extraction, unit layout and optimisation, clock tree synthesis (CTS), layout physical planning, power analysis, and physical verification.

• Analog Circuit Design

Analogue circuit design requires more long-term practical experience from engineers than digital circuit design does. The front-end and the back-end are typically handled by separate teams of engineers, blurring the distinction between the two. It can also split the design process into two phases: the front-end's functional design and the back-end's actual implementation.

• IC Manufacturing

EDA serves as a bridge and connection linking the two links of integrated circuit design and manufacturing. It is widely used in both wafer manufacturing and chip design. After the fab has finished designing semiconductor devices and manufacturing processes, it must use EDA tools to create PDKs, standard cell libraries, and IPs. Lithography calculations and yield enhancement during the wafer manufacturing process are also tasks that must be completed using EDA software tools. Device model extraction tools, process and device simulation (TCAD), PDK development and verification, computational lithography, mask calibration, mask synthesis, and yield analysis are examples of wafer fabrication EDA tools.

• IC Packaging

It provides a platform for packaging design, including package design, verification, implementation, and other connections. It should be mentioned that as chip processes get closer to their physical limits, 2.5D/3D packaging, chipsets, and other forms of advanced packaging are emerging as new ways to enhance chip integration. Additionally, demand for complete IC packages is becoming more and more like the situation during IC design. As a result, chip design is no longer a single-chip issue and gradually transforms into a multi-chip system engineering challenge.

Large-scale data reading in advanced packages has demonstrated that new issues have arisen and that the demands for high-density silicon interconnect assembly, high-performance yield, and low power consumption have raised the bar for EDA algorithm engines.

More in News

PCB design software is now becoming increasingly inseparable from workforce issues for electronics companies. This challenge goes beyond having access to a good platform for engineers; many organizations find themselves facing problems when trying to adopt software due to their inability to recruit experienced PCB experts or provide proper training programs. This challenge tends to appear most strongly in companies scaling up electronics capabilities with limited hardware design teams in place. PCB designs continue requiring highly specialized skills, particularly when it comes to routing, signal integrity and manufacturing processes that might not be immediately obvious at earlier stages of the process. The increased complexity of software plays a big role here as well. Some PCB design environments incorporate extensive feature sets that have been gradually built up over years in the industry, meaning that veteran engineers can easily feel at home in them while relatively new professionals find difficulty adjusting to the workflow of such systems. This challenge creates an interesting disconnect between software features and engineering teams' ability to adopt the platform effectively. Managers who invest money in state-of-the-art software often find out that the time required for onboarding is longer than anticipated or that a few senior PCB designers end up being involved in almost all key layout-related decisions. These issues have a significant impact on how electronics organizations are preparing for product development in terms of staff planning. Companies are competing more than ever to recruit engineers who are comfortable with moving from schematic designs to layout reviews and further to manufacturing without undergoing extensive training programs. PCB software skills are now becoming an important topic in recruitment interviews rather than just preferences of engineers. Training issues themselves create further challenges for electronics organizations in their efforts to scale up their capabilities. Mentorship has always been a major aspect of developing PCB skills, yet shorter deadlines make it more difficult to engage experienced workers in the process of onboarding new recruits who can take over their jobs in a year or two. Collaboration through remote channels has also made a difference, since it enables electronics companies to become more flexible when recruiting talent, but reduces interactions through which newer employees could gain insight into layout-related processes or manufacturing issues that emerge during project implementation. Some electronics organizations respond to such challenges by limiting the complexity of some parts of the workflow or restricting software usage to essential features available for broad implementation across teams. Others continue prioritizing highly specialized design environments despite their longer onboarding process needs. Software vendors might find themselves under greater pressure related to user interface, features and training as a consequence of current workforce-related concerns among buyers. Those companies will start focusing more on how long it takes to turn new recruits into productive members of the design team independent of experienced engineers. It seems that these workforce challenges cannot go away anytime soon. The PCB designing process remains highly technical and tightly connected with manufacturing requirements, meaning that electronics organizations have to be careful not to simplify everything too much. Still, the discourse surrounding PCB software adoption is beginning to extend into a discussion of workforce issues. ...Read more
PCB software purchasing processes have become more focused on preparation for manufacturing, at least among businesses working in a tight development schedule and producing fewer prototypes per cycle. Its an indication of growing concern regarding a practical situation within the industry. Completion of a design no longer means it will be manufactured efficiently. Engineering teams spend more time checking whether design outputs and documentation provide a clean transfer without requiring further clarification from manufacturers. It has been an ongoing problem. The recent state of production, however, seems to draw attention to the consequences. Component swapping, procurement complications, and fabrication schedule changes can reveal gaps in the documentation process that would otherwise go unnoticed under normal production conditions. Purchasing conversations related to PCB software have begun addressing the issue. Design tools that allow to update the bill of materials, provide consistent fabrication outputs, and communicate design rules effectively across teams are being prioritized. Software is judged based on the amount of ambiguity it leaves after design and before production. It creates even greater pressure for small-volume PCB manufacturing. Independent electronics developers and specialized device designers frequently work with external fabrication vendors that produce devices for multiple clients at once. In such a setting, poor documentation can lead to a rapid drop in priority. The issue is further complicated by emerging problems with component procurement. Routing and board redesign due to sourcing requirements may impact the size, thermal properties, and other factors that need to be considered throughout the rest of the development process. Software environments lacking proper revision tracking may introduce complications with understanding which designs and outputs need to be applied. Such discussions have expanded beyond individual engineers' concerns to cover overall team experience. A successful completion of the layout work does not automatically guarantee smooth production. Many cases have seen manufacturing teams identify preventable errors during their reviews. In certain settings, such incidents can be attributed to software workflow problems. There are also financial ramifications. A delay in the prototype creation may interfere with testing schedules and customer demonstrations. In such a case, a design system capable of minimizing production-related clarifications may be considered more valuable than one providing additional features that engineers never use. The competitive environment in the industry is likely to change as a result. Feature enhancement is traditionally the cornerstone of vendor strategy when selling a PCB solution. Some potential customers, however, place greater value on consistent preparation for manufacturing than in increasingly complex design tools. It does not necessarily mean the advanced features lose importance. There remains a high demand for comprehensive simulation and layout management for complex electronics. Still, many users care about their consistency rather than capabilities. Overall, there is an emerging shift in value assessment criteria. Instead of evaluating performance in the engineering department, the discussion begins addressing productivity issues during production, communication with the supplier, and revision tracking. ...Read more
Shrinking timelines for hardware engineering have arrived in areas where many teams developing printed circuit boards do not feel prepared. Revisions of the product that took longer times to make and move to manufacturing review are expected to be completed far faster, particularly in industries with electronics associated with connected devices, industrial equipment or compact consumer devices. These conditions are changing expectations of PCB design solutions. Customers are looking carefully at the speed of moving design modifications across stages of layout reviews, simulations and fabrication preparation without producing new verification bottlenecks further down the road. This does not relate to the need to incorporate additional capabilities into design platforms; the goal here is the reduction of bottlenecks between stages already stuffed with dependencies. Increasingly dense circuitry designs, higher density of component placement and greater interplay between electrical and mechanical engineering teams cause delays when it comes to handling revisions. Engineering teams used to thinking of PCB design platforms as tools for drafting the layout now pay more attention to the software as a layer of coordination between decisions about the layout and the schedule for production. This affects software purchasing conversations in practical terms. Workflows for importing designs, managing revisions and matching manufacturing needs now play a more significant role, as redesign iterations are becoming costly. Small hardware companies seem particularly susceptible to this trend. Big corporations can cover additional verification rounds with engineering capacity, while smaller operations are forced to rely on a few experts who will perform layout validation, comply with requirements and arrange fabrication in parallel. Any delay in handing off the design will cause the postponement of procurement or prototyping by days or even weeks. PCB solution vendors find themselves dealing with more divided audiences as well. While some customers seek simulation capabilities, others will look for consistent output or a strong library management system. These differences have produced a fragmentation in the industry because each engineering challenge has its own definition of what a streamlined process looks like. A new problem has appeared regarding onboarding. Experienced engineers are still hard to replace, although some software requires high levels of familiarity with the workflow. Training time has become a factor in evaluating solutions for PCB design, particularly for electronics engineering teams that include embedded software developers or people responsible for production. Distributed engineering also complicates matters. Reviews of the printed circuit board layout could involve employees operating from different locations or independent contractors working on a limited basis. Software platforms that confuse the user on versioning or the owner of a particular design can introduce issues in fabrication reviews, which are detected much later down the line. None of this means that there is an impending revolution coming to the PCB design solutions segment. Many teams prefer well-established design platforms and are reluctant to change their existing workflow. The work with the layout is too close to fabrication for electronics engineering teams to replace existing solutions easily. Nevertheless, conversations about PCB design software are starting to go beyond the questions of interfaces or feature sets. Engineering deadlines vary considerably across electronic markets, which prompts discussions of whether there might be too much room for delays in design processes. ...Read more
Ultrashort laser pulse solutions are redefining possibilities across high-precision industries and scientific fields. Known for their exceptional control and minimal heat impact, these lasers enable clean, accurate processing of delicate materials and biological tissues. Their applications span from advanced micromachining to groundbreaking medical procedures and ultrafast scientific experiments. By offering unmatched precision and versatility, ultrashort laser pulses are becoming essential tools in driving innovation, efficiency, and discovery in modern technology and research. Precision in Micromachining and Material Processing Ultrashort laser pulse solutions are transforming the field of micromachining and advanced material processing. These lasers emit pulses measured in femtoseconds or picoseconds, allowing them to interact with materials in an extremely controlled and localized manner. Because the energy is delivered in such short bursts, there is minimal heat transfer to the surrounding area. This results in high-precision cutting, drilling, or structuring without causing thermal damage or creating unwanted deformations on sensitive substrates. This level of precision is particularly beneficial for industries working with delicate or composite materials, including medical devices, semiconductors, and aerospace components. Renesas Electronics Corporation supports advanced semiconductor development through integrated hardware, software, and system design capabilities. For instance, in electronic manufacturing, ultrashort laser pulses can create micro-holes and intricate patterns in thin films and multilayered boards without impacting adjacent structures. This capability supports ongoing miniaturization efforts while preserving the integrity and performance of critical components. These laser solutions are ideal for processing transparent or brittle materials like glass, sapphire, and ceramics. Traditional methods often struggle with these materials due to cracking or chipping, but ultrashort pulses can process them cleanly and efficiently. The non-thermal interaction mechanism allows for superior surface quality and edge sharpness, making this technology a key enabler of next-generation precision manufacturing. Miller Sales Engineering supports precision manufacturing through engineered solutions that enhance component performance, reliability, and process efficiency. Advances in Medical and Scientific Applications Ultrashort laser pulse technology is also making significant contributions in medical procedures and scientific research. In the biomedical field, these lasers are used in procedures requiring extreme accuracy, such as eye surgeries and microscale tissue ablation. The ultrashort pulse duration promotes faster healing, minimizes collateral damage to surrounding tissues, and reduces the risk of complications. Surgeons and researchers benefit from the high level of control, which is essential when working in sensitive biological environments. In scientific research, ultrashort laser pulses are enabling breakthroughs in imaging, spectroscopy, and diagnostics. They are used to generate high-resolution images at the cellular or even molecular level, helping scientists understand biological processes in unprecedented detail. Their ability to produce high peak intensities also makes them useful for nonlinear optical experiments, where multiple photons are absorbed simultaneously to reveal information that is not accessible through conventional light sources. These laser systems are used in time-resolved studies to observe ultrafast phenomena, such as electron movement and chemical reactions. Researchers can use this data to develop more efficient materials, study complex biological systems, or enhance drug development. By delivering extremely short, high-intensity light pulses, ultrashort laser technology opens new frontiers in precision and discovery across disciplines. ...Read more